Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacqueline Ogeil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:09, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jacqueline Ogeil

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 07:25, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 10:18, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 10:18, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:32, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Current article is clearly lacking bu it is just a summary of a record company bio from ~1998. Since then she, amongst other thing, founded Accademia Arcadia who were nominated for an ARIA. She has released many more albums than listed here including through ABC Classics. duffbeerforme (talk) 23:15, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand Just a quick Google reveals relevant sources such as award as Woman of Influence, and several references to her role as Director of Duneira at Mount Macedon, Victoria: example, "The property is managed by director Dr Jacqueline Ogeil, who was appointed in 2010 to implement Stoneman's vision to maintain and preserve Duneira and to open it to the public." She seems notable. HouseOfChange (talk) 02:45, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep toured Australia, Europe and Canada. Has issued at least two albums. Passes WP:MUSICBIO.–shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 04:15, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw nomination I was clearly too led by the promotional tone. Thanks for all the input above. Boleyn (talk) 06:17, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.